PDA

View Full Version : Superman vs. Batman vs. Spiderman


Agent J9
August 26th, 2007, 11:32 PM
If these 3 were to fight each other who would win? Hard Question But I would have to say Superman.

CÚsar
August 26th, 2007, 11:34 PM
Superman wins, he is the only of the three who cans fly, and he has the super-power.

Vexx
August 27th, 2007, 01:31 AM
Batman. He's rich and money can buy anything. =P He can buy kryptonite, thus he destroys Superman. (Seen him beat the snot out of superman in an actual comic book anyhow) As for Spiderman....really, he sucks. Never liked that emo sonova...-grumble-

AaronD
August 27th, 2007, 07:09 AM
I say superman, dosed with red kryptonite... He's a badass on red kryptonite.

Alice Shade
August 27th, 2007, 08:56 AM
None of them.

While they are so occupied, Kingpin, Joker and Lex Luthor will ally and pound them all into dirt.

GeoffBoulton
August 27th, 2007, 08:58 AM
Google shows no clear winner although they each have their moments ;-)

Google Trends Superman, Batman, Spiderman (http://www.google.com/trends?q=Superman%2C+Batman%2C+Spiderman)

CÚsar
August 27th, 2007, 12:11 PM
Spiderman is one of the worst super-hero.

He can't fly, he has a little force, his only good power is his sixth sense.

Batman is a cheater, he has'n got ANY super-power. He bought all of his gadgets...

Superman, he is like this now because is an E.T. Not fair too....

Digs
August 27th, 2007, 02:48 PM
C'mon, don't discount the Batman. He's the acme of what it is to be Homo sapiens, trained nearly to the peak of almost everything we can do. Only people who specialise in (field) outperform him, and usually only slightly. Admittedly he's a little crazy - I mean, the man dresses up like a damned bat - but at least he's driven.

That said, I pick Bats as the winner, 'cause he could acquire kryptonite or a red starlight projector easily enough and he's frankly a match for Spidey, even though Spidey has limited super-strength, agility and resilience. The only hitch would be Spidey's weird precog powers, which make the match a bit of a tossup.

CÚsar
August 27th, 2007, 02:54 PM
Superman has got SUper-force, Batman has training.
Superman has got super-speed, Batman has got Batmobile.

Spiderman has got web, Batman has got net.

I think that will be very difficult to decide between them...

SAVAGE
August 28th, 2007, 09:54 PM
None of them, they are as fake as gaybus...anyone who thinks theya re real are guilty of dad wankery.

AaronD
August 29th, 2007, 12:05 AM
None of us think any of them are real... Have you ever heard of a hypothetical situation?

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 12:16 AM
None of us think any of them are real... Have you ever heard of a hypothetical situation?

Sure, hypothetically if I pit my twenty years of martial arts training against you, I should be able to have your guts for garters in unarmed combat.

Hwoever that is in reality because the players in my hypothetical are REAL...say it with me now gayron...REEEEEAAALLLLLL!!

There that wasnt so hard was it?

RebornGooglist
August 29th, 2007, 12:25 AM
Superman was born superman, his alter ego was clarke kent, or kent clarke or whatever, therfore making him a born superhero. The rest of those pussys alter egos is there super hero form, where as their identities are normal people!
Second, all those other exuses for super hero queefs have only one "power" wheras superman has many! and batman has nothin special but a multifunctional belt...
So Superman would definately win!!

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 12:33 AM
Superman was born superman, his alter ego was clarke kent, or kent clarke or whatever, therfore making him a born superhero. The rest of those pussys alter egos is there super hero form, where as their identities are normal people!
Second, all those other exuses for super hero queefs have only one "power" wheras superman has many! and batman has nothin special but a multifunctional belt...
So Superman would definately win!!

I cant believe I am getting into this, but Superman got owned by batman courtesy of a kryptonite ring.

Personally i would have fashioned a big dildo and ass raped him till his fucken brain exploded, but I guess batman is nicer than I am.

RebornGooglist
August 29th, 2007, 12:37 AM
Haha, nice!

AaronD
August 29th, 2007, 12:42 AM
Sure, hypothetically if I pit my twenty years of martial arts training against you, I should be able to have your guts for garters in unarmed combat.

Hwoever that is in reality because the players in my hypothetical are REAL...say it with me now gayron...REEEEEAAALLLLLL!!

There that wasnt so hard was it?

You clearly don't understand hypotheticals, so let me clear this up for you:

Hypothetically, if Batman, Superman, and Spiderman DID exist and got into a fight, who would be the most likely to win? That is this thread is about, Savage. The characters in a hypothetical situation can be only hypothetically existent.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 12:45 AM
You clearly don't understand hypotheticals, so let me clear this up for you:

Hypothetically, if Batman, Superman, and Spiderman DID exist and got into a fight, who would be the most likely to win? That is this thread is about, Savage. The characters in a hypothetical situation can be only hypothetically existent.

So because I used you and me in a hypothetical...we only hypothetically exist. What crap is that?

Dont you exist, becuase I sure as fuck do...you are a twat.

AaronD
August 29th, 2007, 12:47 AM
So because I used you and me in a hypothetical...we only hypothetically exist. What crap is that?

Dont you exist, becuase I sure as fuck do...you are a twat.

I said "can be," not "have to be." Anyway, Douglas Adams did do a pretty good job of proving that neither of us actually exist, in perspective:

It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds. Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero. From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 12:48 AM
Uh... Aaron, don`t try.

To get anything in his two-bit brain, you`d need hammer and chisel to carve it in.

Savage? Lurk more. You`ve exhausted your potential of amusing idiot.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 12:50 AM
I said "can be," not "have to be." Anyway, Douglas Adams did do a pretty good job of proving that neither of us actually exist, in perspective:

Then you and Gayless Adumb are both twats.

Uh... Aaron, don`t try.

To get anything in his two-bit brain, you`d need hammer and chisel to carve it in.

Savage? Lurk more. You`ve exhausted your potential of amusing idiot.
You have exhausted your dad, and your potential to be...well....anything.

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 12:57 AM
Savage, lurk more.

Maybe you`ll read somewhere a good comeback that doesn`t fly over your head completely.

AaronD
August 29th, 2007, 12:58 AM
Douglas Adams was a genius (and a comedic genius). You can't even aspire to think up to his level, Savage.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 01:53 AM
Douglas Adams was a genius (and a comedic genius). You can't even aspire to think up to his level, Savage.

I wouldnt want to be at twat level......you dont seem to have that problem.

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 02:03 AM
You definitely don`t want to be on twat level, indeed.

For someone, who`s still beneath soles level, that would be a dangerous climb.

Lurk more, Savage.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 02:28 AM
You definitely don`t want to be on twat level, indeed.

For someone, who`s still beneath soles level, that would be a dangerous climb.

Lurk more, Savage.

Well coming from someone who needs a telescope to see the bottom of a worm level...I wont be to offended.

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 02:59 AM
Indeed. Having to gase from the very top, I do miss petty worms from time to time.

That`s why we keep you around, you know. Given, that worms are right above you, that makes you an expert on petty, dirty and useless.

Lurk more, Savage.

Your opinion is the least useful bit of information to ever pass by the Google.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 03:07 AM
Indeed. Having to gase from the very top, I do miss petty worms from time to time.

You are a twat, you cant gaze down at something and see its bottom...nice try, lame but nice.

I wonder if you really ahve a science degree, because that one went right over your head.

Your opinion is the least useful bit of information to ever pass by the Google.

Now, now dont be modest its only a very close second to your own

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 03:10 AM
Never realised that you can look DOWN with telescope?

Lurk more, Savage, stop spreading FCNS.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 03:16 AM
Never realised that you can look DOWN with telescope?

Lurk more, Savage, stop spreading FCNS.

Exactly my point you fucking ming moron, you are the kutu in the vula of life, a little annoying kutu sembe.

Let me explain this to your simple fucking mind...you need a telescope to see the bottom of a worm...means you need to look UP to see it.

God you are dumb, its time like this when i wish their was a god, then we could blame someone for your lack of brain activity...you are by far the most dumb bitch I know, and i know a bitch in a coma.

Alice Shade
August 29th, 2007, 03:30 AM
Heheh...

What`s the matter, Savage? Talking about cunt is the only way for you to get closer to that part of female anathomy?

N.B. If you think there should be worms in that cavity, well, your first and last girlfriend was probably dead by the time you asked her out.

Lurk more, Savage!

P.S. Discussion closed. Savage in cycle.

SAVAGE
August 29th, 2007, 03:38 AM
Heheh...

What`s the matter, Savage? Talking about cunt is the only way for you to get closer to that part of female anathomy?

Actually being married i find myself with ample acess to cunt.

N.B. If you think there should be worms in that cavity, well, your first and last girlfriend was probably dead by the time you asked her out.

Lurk more, Savage!

Wow, I dont think that worms need to go in that cavity, perhaps you need a man with a bigger penis. You necrophillic tendencies are alarming...I guess to each his own, more power to you.

P.S. Discussion closed. Savage in cycle.

you will repond, you must obey me.

AaronD
August 29th, 2007, 04:14 AM
Do you honestly not get that she was accusing you of necrophillia, not admitting to it?

Digs
August 29th, 2007, 03:32 PM
Aaron, you can't let savage inflame you. The fool doesn't even know who Douglas Adams (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchhiker%27s_Guide) was, he's only talking smack about the man to anger you. You must control your emotions if you're to get any conversation of value around him.

Kokoba
August 29th, 2007, 11:26 PM
Back to the topic at hand.

Batman. There is absolutely no question about it, Batman could take that Spiderman wanker and twinked-out Superman without batting (hah!) an eyelash.

RebornGooglist
August 30th, 2007, 11:54 PM
Nice pun... but superman would kick his ass...

Digs
August 31st, 2007, 02:22 PM
Nah, there're lots of ways to beat Supes. The three traditional weaknesses of Superman:

1) Kryptonite. Chunks of his home planet. Dunno why it weakens him, some bunk about radiation and his powers.

2) The light of a nonyellow star. Superman is powered by yellow light. Thus, he's powerless in nonyellow light, and half-powered in half-yellow lights such as orange. He can be briefly supercharged by being tossed into a star of the appropriate colour. No clue as to why the powerlessness takes place nearly immediately after exposure.

3) Magic. Magic is apparently outside his super-portfolio and does nasty things to Supes. Thus Captain Marvel and the various magical jerks in DC are great against him, like Zatanna and Doc' Fate.

An awesome villain by the name of Prometheus once bested him without knowing any of these using only psychological reasoning and a group of hostages. Simply threatened to kill them unless Superman somehow killed himself.

Alice Shade
August 31st, 2007, 03:02 PM
Sigh.

Guys. To be honest, it`s not exactly possible to compare either of them.

For the simple reason, that comics about each of them are even more controversive, then Bible.

If here was a definite "layout" of possibilities/abilities/intentions of each one, there would be some way to determine the winner, but in abstract... "Hey, who`d win?"... Nah.

When it comes to direct slugfest, Superman wins hands-down - simply cause he`s the only one who can shrug off a rock to the head, and the only one, who can cave in someone`s skull with a fingersnap.

Now, when it comes to "american duel", Batman gots a good chance to score a hit at Superman with some cryptonite (which, for a "native Superman`s planet chunk" is strangely available by wheelbarrows to anyone willing), and fuck up Spiderman in some way (Like, I dunno... Spraying specific acid mix in air so Spiderman`s clothes and web would disintegrate, for example, then handing him his own ass with some sleeping gas or something.)

And if it`s just "who can fuck up others the best without them knowing", then Spiderman gets some sneaky chances in - starting from exposing others` identities in all newspapers, and ending up with robbing banks (Poor Batman - useless Batman.) and laboratories (Cryptonite ahoy.), and sneaking shit in others` hideouts.

In short, it`s all too screwed up to consider, and practically impossible to predict, simply because anyone can offer a different solution - given that all three are just imagination constructs.

For all I know, bleugh, there are people who`d conclude that it will end in hot gay threesome.

Digs
August 31st, 2007, 05:13 PM
Well, sure it's pointless, but a lot of games are, except as fun. I enjoy generalised logic games like that. Coming to your solution is the fun bit, not determining which is correct or incorrect.

RebornGooglist
August 31st, 2007, 07:55 PM
Well said digs!! ;)