Kokoba
May 30th, 2007, 06:43 PM
It's more likely than you think.
This discussion will probably be spoilerific, for those of you who haven't yet seen it.
So Frenrir and I just got back from seeing 300. And while I liked the movie, I couldn't help but notice extremely jingoistic overtones that honestly disturb me. I'm still waffling on whether it's just coincidence, or something more...icky? tasteless? Fill in the appropriate adjective here. I figure talking it over with you folks will help me come up with an answer.
There are basically two big things about the movie that made my eyebrows go up a bit.
1. Leonidas doesn't have permission, according to Spartan law, to go to war, but he goes anyway, and in the movie it's "justified" because the council/lawmaking official types are portrayed pretty much as either corrupt (the priests, Theron) or incompetent/clueless (the old dudes in the council), and I guess you can interpret that as you will, though it left a really bad taste in my mouth.
2. There is constant talk of "free men" fighting against "tyranny" and defending "liberty," "reason," etc. Just lots of buzzword dropping.
Granted, this 300 is based on the Frank Miller comics (which predate the Iraq war), which is in turn influenced The 300 Spartans from 1962, which is in the earlier years of the Vietnam War, and so it could be just be residual 1960s attitudes leaking in. But I don't know, I haven't read the comics. I want to, because any differences between the movie and the original would be pretty telling.
So anyway, I'll cut myself off there. What do youse guys make of it?
This discussion will probably be spoilerific, for those of you who haven't yet seen it.
So Frenrir and I just got back from seeing 300. And while I liked the movie, I couldn't help but notice extremely jingoistic overtones that honestly disturb me. I'm still waffling on whether it's just coincidence, or something more...icky? tasteless? Fill in the appropriate adjective here. I figure talking it over with you folks will help me come up with an answer.
There are basically two big things about the movie that made my eyebrows go up a bit.
1. Leonidas doesn't have permission, according to Spartan law, to go to war, but he goes anyway, and in the movie it's "justified" because the council/lawmaking official types are portrayed pretty much as either corrupt (the priests, Theron) or incompetent/clueless (the old dudes in the council), and I guess you can interpret that as you will, though it left a really bad taste in my mouth.
2. There is constant talk of "free men" fighting against "tyranny" and defending "liberty," "reason," etc. Just lots of buzzword dropping.
Granted, this 300 is based on the Frank Miller comics (which predate the Iraq war), which is in turn influenced The 300 Spartans from 1962, which is in the earlier years of the Vietnam War, and so it could be just be residual 1960s attitudes leaking in. But I don't know, I haven't read the comics. I want to, because any differences between the movie and the original would be pretty telling.
So anyway, I'll cut myself off there. What do youse guys make of it?