Church of Google Forum  

Go Back   Church of Google Forum > Advanced Search > Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Discussion Try to keep this area free from flames. enjoyment

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old June 10th, 2010, 12:10 PM   #1
Gnome @ Home
Embodiment of Google
tagnostic's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,343
Default wikipedia

i personally don't feel that its a valid source
because it has too many uncitable people and opinions involved
i don't cite rush limbaugh or the huffington post for the same reasons
but with wiki its even worse because your not dealing with one persons opinion
that you already know is biased and how but with untold numbers of morons
who's bias'es you don't know,
everything regardless of the source should be shepardized and back checked
but its a helluva lot harder when its any moron on the planet that has anonymous input

wiki's own view

everybody does it
because everybody can
that makes it a non usable source
It would be nice to be sure of anything, the way some are sure of everything

Believe someone seeking the truth, doubt those that have found it

Last edited by tagnostic : June 10th, 2010 at 12:23 PM.
tagnostic is offline   Reply With Quote

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Contact Us - Chat - Blog - Main Page - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2007 Church of Google | We are not affiliated with Google Inc.